The Big Flip: A Deep Dive Look at the Supply Side of the 2020 Presidential Election in Pennsylvania and Its Implications

NOW AVAILABLE FOR PURCHASE HERE.

Summary and Preview

In the wake of the 2020 Presidential Election, it seems to have become “politically incorrect” to raise questions about election integrity. This is unfortunate, as it is fundamental to our democracy that legitimate concerns about mail-in voting processes or other issues of trust be voiced and debated.

The Big Flip meticulously documents the epic saga of mail-in voting in Pennsylvania’s 2020 Presidential Election, highlighting some worrisome aspects. Though Donald Trump had won this pivotal state in a close contest against Hillary Clinton in 2016, the state flipped back to the Democrats in 2020 in an election distinguished by the introduction of no-excuse mail-in voting.

Quantitative analysis is a core component of the discussion—a multifaceted statistical exploration of mail-in voting patterns. The quantitative discussion is merged with an examination of contextual and circumstantial details. The kinds of irregularities that “no-excuse” mail-in voting may facilitate are considered as well.

The data exploration reveals a remarkable landscape — a poorly illuminated space from which arose odd statistical patterns—a twilight zone of sorts. These puzzling phenomena are consistent with cyber-threat or misconduct scenarios.

For instance, among voters who had applied for a ballot before September 15, Republicans were more than twice as likely to end up with an unreturned ballot compared to Democrats. Not only that, but ballots returned by Republicans on average took three days longer in transit compared to those returned by Democrats (within this application date cohort.) These nonreturn rate and turnaround time disparities combine into strong circumstantial evidence that digitally stored addresses may have been altered—an address tampering breach—whereby the targeted ballots were lost or delayed in transit.

Multiple technical mishaps tied to the state’s obsolete and error-prone database management systems made the landscape yet more murky. Sly legal maneuvering (lawfare) by the Democratic party, seeking partisan advantages going into the election, cast an additional shadow over the process.

The book concludes with a discussion of how Pennsylvania and other states could develop more secure and trustworthy mail-in voting processes. Suggested preventive measures include correcting and updating voter registration records, closing cybersecurity gaps, incorporating more controls into the ballot application and collection processes, and instituting real-time monitoring of data. 

While this book focuses on the Pennsylvania experience, it would be of interest to readers in any state who are concerned about election integrity and credibility and ways to bolster these going forward.

Vladimir putin molodets, politik lider i borets.
-Oleg Likhachev.